Venue: Ashburton Hall - HCC. View directions
Contact: Email: members.services@hants.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Derek Mellor, Rhydian Vaughan and Rupert Kyrle. Councillor Dominic Hiscock attended as a deputy for Councillor Kyrle. |
|
Declarations of interest All Members who believe they have a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter to be considered at the meeting must declare that interest and, having regard to Part 3 Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members’ Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore all Members with a Personal Interest in a matter being considered at the meeting should consider, having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 4 of the Code, whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 5 of the Code, consider whether it is appropriate to leave the meeting while the matter is discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code. Minutes:
Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest in any matter considered at the meeting they must declare that interest at the time of the relevant debate and, having regard to the circumstances described in Part 3, Paragraph 1.5 of the County Council's Members' Code of Conduct, leave the meeting while the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with Paragraph 1.6 of the Code. Furthermore Members were mindful that where they believed they had a Non-Pecuniary interest in a matter being considered at the meeting they considered whether such interest should be declared, and having regard to Part 5, Paragraph 2 of the Code, considered whether it was appropriate to leave the meeting whilst the matter was discussed, save for exercising any right to speak in accordance with the Code.
Councillor Martin Tod declared an interest as the Cabinet Member responsible for parking at Winchester City Council.
Councillor Nick Adams-King
declared an interest as the Cabinet Member responsible for parking
at Test Valley Borough Council. |
|
Minutes of previous meeting PDF 212 KB To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting Minutes: The minutes of the last meeting were reviewed and agreed. |
|
Chairman's Announcements To receive any announcements the Chairman may wish to make. Minutes: The Chairman confirmed that the 12 May meeting had been cancelled. |
|
Deputations To receive any deputations notified under Standing Order 12. Minutes: It was confirmed that two deputations had been
received for the meeting, both speaking on ‘On-Street Chargeable Parking in
Lymington’. |
|
To consider a report from the Head of Law and Governance and Monitoring Officer, which asks the Economy Transport and Environment (Overview and Scrutiny) Committee (‘ETE Select Committee’) to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Select Committee received a report from the Monitoring Officer (item 7 in the minute book), which asked them to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’.
Councillor Tod summarised the concerns as highlighted by the deputations and confirmed that more information was needed regarding the location of parking metres, the amount of free and off-road parking and the financial consequences of the decision.
In a presentation by officers, the Committee learned that various surveys had been undertaken both before and during the pandemic and that the parking was regularly oversubscribed along the High Street. It was felt that 20mins of free parking would be a good balance and minimise impact whilst assisting with cost recovery. New Forest District Council had been liaised with throughout the process and officers would continue to work alongside to monitor off-street parking and any potential displaced parking. The aim was to align charges with off-street parking, also utilising payment Apps as well as enabling residents to pay with cash for accessibility in the short to medium term. It was anticipated that 10 machines would be suitable due to the length of the High Street.
During debate some Members felt
that it reasonable to charge for parking on a cost-recovery basis
and that it was unusual to get free on-road parking, whereas others
felt like it was a missed opportunity for a better scheme that was
more joined-up with the local community.
RESOLVED
Voting
|
|
Bikeability Cycle Training - Consideration of Request to Exercise Call-in Powers PDF 131 KB To consider a report from the Head of Law and Governance and Monitoring Officer, which asks the Economy Transport and Environment (Overview and Scrutiny) Committee (‘ETE Select Committee’) to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Select Committee received a report from the Monitoring Officer (item 6 in the minute book), which asked them to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’.
Members queried the
implementation of the proposals and the reliance on teachers. In
summarising the decision, officers confirmed that whilst teachers
would be present, the training would be done by qualified
instructors. Children did not pass or fail, but achieved a certain
standard and level before completing the assessment. It was more
effective to bring in-house as the grant could be better utilised
and other sources of funding could also be potentially sourced if
needed in the longer term. There were already two qualified
instructors and it was anticipated that more would be TUPE’d across by the end of July. RESOLVED
|
|
To consider a report from the Head of Law and Governance and Monitoring Officer, which asks the Economy Transport and Environment (Overview and Scrutiny) Committee (‘ETE Select Committee’) to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’.
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Select Committee received a report from the Monitoring Officer (item 8 in the minute book), which asked them to consider whether or not it should exercise its powers under Section 9F of Part 1A of the Local Government Act 2000 (‘the 2000 Act’), referred to in the County Council’s Constitution as ‘Call-in’.
It was noted that additional financial
information had been provided in an exempt appendix, which was
noted by the Committee and helped better justify the decision that
had been made. Where transfers had already taken place in the
County, it was felt to be working well with complaints being
handled in a timely manner and residents feeling supported.
RESOLVED |
|
Exclusion of Press and Public To resolve that the public be excluded from the meeting during the following items of business, as it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the public were present during these items there would be disclosure to them of exempt information within Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, and further that in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons set out in the reports. Minutes: The exempt appendices were not discussed directly and therefore it was not required to exclude the press and public at this meeting. |
|
EXEMPT APPENDIX - On-Street Chargeable Parking - High Street, Lymington Consideration of Request to Exercise Call-in Powers The exempt appendix from the 10 March Decision Day relating to On-Street Chargeable Parking in Lymington (Item 7 on the agenda). Minutes: This appendix was considered as part of the open item on the agenda without any of the information being declared.
|
|
EXEMPT APPENDIX (ETE) - Parking - Service Consolidation Efficiencies - Consideration of Request to Exercise Call-in Powers The exempt appendix from the Economy, Transport and Environment department relating to the Parking – Service Consolidation Efficiencies report (Item 8 on the agenda – appendix 4). Minutes: This appendix was considered as part of the open item on the agenda without any of the information being declared.
|