a) CQC
Update for Portsmouth Hospitals Trust
Representatives from Portsmouth Hospitals Trust presented a
report providing an update on the action taken by the Trust in
response to the areas the Care Quality Commission had identified as
“Requiring Improvement”.
Members heard:
·
The Trust was taking a different approach to move to
a culture of continuous improvement and engagement not simply due
to CQC ratings, but from their own aspirations to provide excellent
care.
·
A shared assurance and improvement programme with
commissioners alongside heat map activity with CCGs and
Healthwatch to agree collaboratively on
concerns and address issues raised with an agreed plan for working
together to investigate, respond, and measure
improvements.
·
A quarterly programme of quality reviews and
conducting mock investigations similar to the CQC with other
partners in health and social care system to track and evaluate
improvements on the ground with an agile and responsive programme
of quality reviews.
·
Ward accreditation programmes and early visits to
provide encouragement towards bronze, silver, and gold awards based
on CQC metrics and locally raised issues.
·
An integrated joined-up improvement plan with
activities will be key, rather than having various plans in
response to feedback from CQC, local teams, and
aspirations
Regarding
ambulance delays, Members heard:
- Despite a
capacity plan for winter pressures with added investment and
resources, winter was challenging with a steady increase in daily
attendance including older and more vulnerable
patients.
- Significant improvements have been made to aim for a 93%
occupation rate to weather the winter effectively.
- There was
a deterioration in ambulance handover delays and requires a
significant amount of work to improve.
- The older
building layout not designed for nearly 400 attendants daily
creates added challenges to deliver consistent flow with higher
than 92% occupancy.
- 95% is the
average occupancy and measure of hospital capacity with robust
middle grade staffing overnight and support.
- The
objective is to move towards upper quartile of national performance
for ambulance delays which is ambitious but necessary to
maintain.
- The
necessary actions include continued commitment with consolidations
and evidence-based improvements for the occupancy project, as well
as proactive bed moving to decompress the emergency department at
times of maximum crowding.
- The Trust
have received 58 million for an emergency/urgent care rebuild and
transformation programme over the coming years to fit current and
new challenges
- Whole
system response and data from past reviews revealed the 4 key
drivers (population health and demand, emergency department
processes, bed occupancy, and out of hospital service).
- A 92%
occupancy goal to provide consistent flow, avoid ambulance
holdups.
- Users need
to know how to access emergency care and facilities with necessary
support for people who are ready to go home.
- The
immediate next steps include: discharge targets, reduce number of
medically fit patients, increase paramedic access to alternative
care, and implement agreed out of hospital schemes.
- Local
health and social care partners (including the county), as well as
NHS England and NHS improvement collaborations are
underway.
In
response to questions, Members heard:
-
Every patient is triaged by a nurse or doctor upon
arrival but due to delays, this can take place in the ambulance,
thereby holding it back from going on to another
location.
-
30-35 beds free would reduce occupancy to 92% by
getting medically able patients out of beds for more system
capacity and better delivery performance.
-
Healthier patients need to receive the right care in
a different setting.
-
The goal is to reach people earlier in their
admission pathway and integrated intermediate care workstream to address and ensure that older, frail
and vulnerable patients do not have prolonged waits and are able to
go home earlier.
-
The clinical judgement of the paramedics remains
unaffected by occupancy rates and they are trained to determine who
needs treatment in hospital.
-
As a safety and risk issue, patients must be
offloaded safely allowing ambulances to get to the next call
immediately.
-
SCAS is excellent and 56% of patients do not require
hospital care, heading home after treatment and the safety of the
patients remaining the priority.
-
In addressing a growing population, the modelling
done has considered 5-10 years ahead and as a health-economy been
anticipatory of future needs.
-
Traditional ways of delivering care will be
inadequate and strategic provision of care nearer to people with
access and flexibility without an A&E default with specific
plans in place for people with long-term conditions.
-
The majority of care is still delivered through the
hospital and this is an opportunity to address the challenges and
navigate an intelligent way forward with renewed commitment to
safely delivering the best care possible.
-
Anticipatory prescriptions in a timely manner and
within capacity ahead of patient discharge is a key component of
current occupancy project.
-
Patients are also triaged and directed to the GP
service based in A&E 7 days a week, 10 hours a day and the
service has been in place for about a year.
-
Urgent treatment centres and primary care hubs are
useful but logistically challenging to staff and run with adequate
resources and transportation needs.
-
Delays in assessments or moving patients around
affects the occupancy level, flow, and wait times.
-
A recent analysis of 60k patients will exceptionally
useful in exploring anticipatory discharge prescriptions, positive
flow, and appropriate or efficient use of the beds.
-
Discharge lounges help but proven to be risky and
less efficient, while delivering prescriptions is very
expensive.
-
With changes in population and increased demands,
system plans and organizational changes with system partners is
necessary to meet needs.
-
The most significant success of the winter was the
limited rescheduling of planned operations which continues to
improve.
-
Currently waiting for CQC information request to
trigger an inspection in the next 12-18 months and the Trust would
be disappointed if the rating didn’t change.
-
Plans not yet agreed, refined, and ratified but
expected to be over the next few weeks and work is already
underway.
RESOLVED:
That the Committee:
a. Noted the findings
of the most recent CQC inspection of Portsmouth
Hospitals
Foundation
Trust.
b. Noted the approach
of the Trust to respond to the findings.
c. Requested a further progress update for the November 2019
meeting.
a)
CQC Update from Southern Health Foundation
Trust
Item
taken first, out of order, with Chairman’s permission to
accommodate presenter.
The Chief
Executive from Southern Health Foundation Trust presented a report
providing an update on the action taken by the Trust in response to
the areas the Care Quality Commission had identified as
“Requiring Improvement”.
Members heard:
-
Reasonably good progress has been made on several
overdue actions whilst waiting to complete audit.
-
Providing single sex accommodation has been a
struggle at several facilities and some have been addressed fully
and provide a dementia-friendly environment.
-
The CQC will be considering these improvements
carefully during re-inspections.
-
An information request was received last week and
the first step of the process with a full inspection to follow
within 6 months of submission.
-
Action plan spreadsheets including overdue actions
will be reviewed by local panel every month for complete, validated
status and evidence-based resolutions.
-
Delivery of the action plan is now part of the
governance and operational procedure for greater traction and
improvements.
In
response to questions, Members heard:
-
There has been organizational pressure and demand
for adult mental health beds.
-
Proper gender separation in lounge areas, bathrooms
lower risks and prevents dignity issues for vulnerable patients
with nursing oversight.
Members noted that progress was being made but still had a long
way to go to.
RESOLVED:
That the Committee:
a. Noted the findings
of the most recent CQC inspection of Southern Health
Foundation
Trust.
b. Noted the approach
of the Trust to respond to the findings.
c. Requested a further progress update for the November 2019
meeting.
c) CQC Inspection Report
from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
A
representative from Frimley Health Foundation Trust presented a
report providing an update on action taken by the Trust following
their Care Quality Commission inspection of the Trust’s
services with an overall rating of “Good”. The detailed improvement plan put into place is to
be shared with the Committee following the meeting.
Members heard:
-
Frimley Health Foundation Trust was created in 2014
with the first inspection in November 2018 (clinical) and then
December 2018 (leadership and resources).
-
The CQC select services for inspection to take an
in-depth look at a specific area.
-
In March the Trust were pleased to receive an
overall rating of “Good” while hospitals retained their
individual ratings.
-
The Trust is already putting improvements into place
and not being complacent in providing the best care for
patients.
-
‘Must-dos’ include maternity staffing
(midwife to birth ratios) which do not meet the national benchmark,
but the business case has been approved and funded.
-
A detailed strategy for recruitment and retainment will be in place as well as a structured
approach to managing safety and staffing issues.
-
Mandatory training in line with roles and
responsibilities is a must-do to meet the benchmark of 85% needing
investment in training and online accessibility
options.
-
Even with Outstanding and Good care, staff are
careful to support independence for patients both in and out of
hospital.
In
response to questions, Members heard that:
-
The shortage of midwives did not have any serious
implications and safety was maintained across maternity
services.
-
The catchment includes mothers with complex needs
and progress is being made towards well-managed care.
-
Creating an environment where midwives choose to
work and are supported with a balanced workload is key.
-
Members congratulated the Trust on their ratings and
noted that it was the best matrix of ratings the committee had seen
and that “Good” can always go to
“Outstanding”.
RESOLVED:
That the Committee:
a. Noted the update on
action taken by the Trust in response to the CQC inspection
findings.
b. Requested a further
progress update for the March 2020 meeting.
d) CQC Inspection Report
from University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust
A
representative from University Hospital Southampton Foundation
Trust presented a report providing an update on action taken by the
Trust following their Care Quality Commission inspection of the
Trust’s services with an overall rating of
“Good”.
Members heard:
-
The CQC inspections included 4 key services across 4
sites.
-
The Trust retained an overall “Good”
rating and hospitals, their specific ratings.
-
Good practices for safety have been put into use and
issues are being addressed.
-
An older estate location remains a challenge with an
increase in demand and limited capacity.
-
There have been positive findings with good and
outstanding observations but also must do actions and ongoing
audits.
An
action plan would be submitted following the meeting per the
Chairman’s request.
RESOLVED:
That the Committee:
a. Noted the update on
action taken by the Trust in response to the CQC inspection
findings.
b. Requested a further
progress update for the November 2019 meeting.