To consider the report of Cabinet seeking approval of recommendations in regard to the Medium Term Financial Strategy and Transformation to 2019 savings proposals.
Minutes:
The Council considered a report from the Cabinet
(Item 10 in the Minute Book) providing an update on the medium term
financial strategy for the County and Transformation to 2019
savings proposals and detailed Equality Impact Assessments,
considered by the Cabinet on 16 October 2017. The Cabinet report
outlines the feedback from the consultation exercise ‘Serving
Hampshire – Balancing the Budget’. The Cabinet had also
considered the Treasury Management mid-year monitoring report for
2017/18 (Appendix 2 to the Cabinet report) in accordance with the
CIPFA Code of Practice and recommended it to the County Council for
approval.
In presenting the report, the Leader confirmed that it dealt with some difficult recommendations as a result
of reductions in government Grant coupled with inflationary
and demographic pressures which required savings of £140m 2019/20; a figure that was reported to Council in
February last year. The Leader
confirmed that the County Council remains in a stable financial
state having successfully delivered a previous round of savings for
Transformation to 2017, whilst retaining high quality essential
services. By adopting a long term approach, taking difficult
decisions in consultation and using the County Council’s
carefully managed reserves in a way that minimises the impact of
changes had proved to be a successful approach and one that would
be continued. The Leader emphasised
that by law, the County Council must set a balanced budget.
The Leader drew attention to the significant
contribution that the various forms of commercial activity makes to
the County Council’s financial resilience, and asked Members to note the almost £20m extra for
Children’s Services to address demand pressures, social
worker attraction and retention, home to school transport and
special guardianship
orders. Recommendation (xi) from the
Cabinet was highlighted which provided £500,000 support to
Town and Parish Councils to provide pump priming funding for
targeted, joint initiatives aimed at improving local
services.
The Leader also drew Members attention to the additional resolution
of Cabinet (xii) as follows:
“Require that officers, as specific decision making processes move forward, continue to explore all viable options to revise or refine these proposals with particular regard to service continuity in areas such as community transport, school crossing patrols and waste and recycling centres, in consultation with partners and stakeholders as appropriate, while recognising that any modification to the proposal must be consistent with the financial and time imperatives of the overall programme.”
The Leader moved the
report’s recommendations and proposed an additional recommendation, which was seconded by Councillor Mel
Kendal as follows:
“That Hampshire County Council calls on the Government to permit Councils responsible for administering the national Concessionary Travel Scheme, to levy modest charges on older persons’ passes, e.g. 50p for each use and £10 for issuing and renewing permits, with the balance of revenue raised after costs to be used to support uncommercial, public or community transport services serving vulnerable or disadvantaged residents or areas.”
The Executive Member for Economic Development highlighted a number of areas in the Cabinet report such as:
·
£14million for building smaller homes for children with
complex needs with a further five houses on stream and more to
follow; approval to transfer £3million from capital to
revenue between the County Council and Enterprise M3 LEP to achieve
greater flexibility in delivering economic growth across
Hampshire
·
work on joint ventures that yield additional income or generate a
return either through the County Council’s land holdings or
through relationships with partners and contractors, e.g.
Manydown development
· addition to the Capital Programme of schemes associated with the development of Woodhouse Lane in Botley to facilitate Phase 1 of the Botley By-pass, a new secondary school and other infrastructure and utility works which will assist with Local Plan requirements
The Executive Member for Economic Development concluded that
further work would be carried out in line with Cabinet’s
resolution (xii), as detailed above.
The full opening debate speeches of the Leader and the Executive Member for Economic Development are available to view on the website.
Opposition Group Leaders responded to the proposals. Councillor Keith House, seconded by Councillor Adrian Collett proposed an Amendment to Recommendation (d), as set out in the Council report, as follows and requested that the vote on the Amendment be a recorded vote and if that was lost, that recommendation (d) be voted on separately:
“Revise recommendation d) from
d) The savings proposals in Appendix 3, subject to further consultation and executive decision making where necessary.
to
d)
The savings proposals in Appendix 3, be referred back to Cabinet
for further discussion to evolve new proposals that
(i) give more protection to frontline
services,
(ii)
protect vulnerable residents rather than see these communities
subject of the harshest cuts
(iii) develop a more coherent long-term investment strategy to
generate income,
(iv)
genuinely work in partnership with the rest of the public sector
rather than cost-shunt to the NHS, police, local councils, and even
within the County Council
(v) work with other councils and more effectively lobby government and Hampshire’s MPs to protect rather than destroy local services.”
No other amendments were proposed.
During the course of a full debate, views in support of, or raising concern, about the proposals were expressed.
The Liberal Democrat Amendment, as above, was put to the vote and the outcome recorded as follows:
FOR
21
Councillors: Chegwyn, Clarke,
Collett, Mark Cooper, Craig, Dowden,
Frankum, Harrison, Hiscock, House,
Irish, Gavin, Kyrle, Porter, Price,
Simpson, Tennent, Thornton, Tod, Wade
and Westbrook.
AGAINST 49
Councillors: Bennison, Boiles, Bolton, Branson, Briggs, Brooks, Carew,
Carpenter, Carter, Chadd, Rod Cooper,
Dibbs, Edgar, Evans, Fairhurst, Forster, Gibson, Glen, Grajewski, Harvey, Hayre, Heron, Hughes, Humby, Huxstep, Joy,
Keast, Kemp-Gee, Kendal, Latham, Locke,
Mans, McEvoy, McNair Scott, Mellor,
Mocatta, Oppenheimer, Perry, Quantrill,
Reid, Stallard, Still, Taylor, Thacker,
Thierry, Vaughan, Warwick, White and Withers.
ABSTAIN 1
Councillor Burgess
The Liberal Democrat Amendment was therefore lost.
Recommendation (d) of the Council report was put to the vote and recorded as follows:
FOR:
47
Councillors: Boiles, Bolton, Branson,
Briggs, Brooks, Carpenter, Carter, Chadd, Rod Cooper, Dibbs, Edgar, Evans, Fairhurst, Forster, Gibson, Glen, Grajewski, Harvey, Hayre, Heron, Hughes, Humby, Huxstep, Joy,
Keast, Kemp-Gee, Kendal, Latham, Locke,
Mans, McEvoy, McNair Scott, Mellor,
Mocatta, Oppenheimer, Perry, Quantrill,
Reid, Stallard, Still, Taylor, Thacker,
Thierry, Vaughan, Warwick, White and Withers.
AGAINST: 21
Councillors: Chegwyn, Clarke,
Collett, Mark Cooper, Craig, Dowden,
Frankum, Harrison, Hiscock, House,
Irish, Gavin, Kyrle, Porter, Price,
Simpson, Tennent, Thornton, Tod, Wade,
Westbrook.
ABSTAIN: 3
Councillors: Bennison, Burgess and Carew.
The vote on Recommendation (d) of the Council report was therefore carried.
The Additional Recommendation proposed by the
Leader was put to the vote and recorded as follows:
FOR:
49
Councillors: Bennison, Boiles, Bolton, Branson, Briggs, Brooks, Carew, Carpenter, Carter, Chadd, Rod Cooper, Dibbs, Edgar, Evans, Fairhurst, Forster, Gibson, Glen, Grajewski, Harvey, Hayre, Heron, Hughes, Humby, Huxstep, Joy, Keast, Kemp-Gee, Kendal, Latham, Locke, Mans, McEvoy, McNair Scott, Mellor, Mocatta, Oppenheimer, Perry, Quantrill, Reid, Stallard, Still, Taylor, Thacker, Thierry, Vaughan, Warwick, White and Withers.
AGAINST: 20
Councillors: Chegwyn, Clarke, Collett, Mark Cooper, Craig, Dowden, Frankum, Harrison, Hiscock, House, Irish, Gavin, Kyrle, Price, Simpson, Tennent, Thornton, Tod, Wade, Westbrook.
ABSTAIN: 2
Councillors: Burgess and Porter.
RESOLVED:
That the County Council approved:
a)
The mid-year report on treasury management activity at Appendix 2
and note potential impact on the investment strategy of defaulting
to a retail client with effect from 3 January 2018.
b)
The immediate commencement of applications for elected professional
client status with all relevant institutions in order to ensure the
County Council can continue to implement an effective investment
and acknowledge that in electing for professional client status the
County Council are agreeing to forgo the protections available to
retail clients attached at Annex 1 of Appendix 2.
c)
That responsibility be delegated to the Section 151 Officer (the
Director of Corporate Resources) for the purposes of completing the
applications.
d)
The savings proposals in Appendix 3, subject to further
consultation and executive decision making where
necessary.
e)
The remainder of the spending required, totalling £22.5m, to
complete the IT enabling and EPP programmes, following the
£16.1m that was approved in July this year.
f)
Recurring funding from 2018/19 onwards of £10.25m to cover
the increased costs of social workers, Home to School Transport and
payments for Special Guardianship Orders.
g)
A one-off sum of £1.4m from the Invest to Save Reserve to
fund additional resource within the in-house Transformation Team
until the end of 2019/20.
h)
Up to £35m of capital spend (funded through prudential
borrowing) to invest in the purchase of land and development of the
Manydown site.
i)
An initial sum of £3m is transferred from capital to revenue
between the County Council and Enterprise M3 LEP as outlined in
this report and that delegated authority be given to the Director
of Corporate Resources to agree further transfers if
required.
j) Capital spend of £1.23m to implement improvements whereby specialist equipment will be installed to improve the quantity and quality of data collection and monitoring in relation to water bacteria risk management. To be funded from the savings in non-departmental budgets in the current year as identified in Section 4.
k)
An increase in the capital programme of £1m per annum from
2017/18 to raise the provision for the general replacement of and
additions to the fleet managed by HTM to £3m per annum, to be
funded through prudential borrowing.
l)
The addition of schemes associated with the development of land at
Woodhouse Lane to the value of £41.695m to the capital
programme as outlined in paragraph 11.10.
m) Hampshire County Council calls on the Government to permit Councils responsible for administering the national Concessionary Travel Scheme, to levy modest charges on older persons’ passes, e.g. 50p for each use and £10 for issuing and renewing permits with the balance of revenue raised after costs to be used to support uncommercial, public or community transport services serving vulnerable or disadvantaged residents or areas.
Supporting documents: