Agenda item

(a) To consider complaints made against the Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire.

(b) To consider additional comments received from the complainants

(c) To consider additional comments received from the complained against

The Sub-Committee received a report of the Democratic Services Officer outlining the detail of two complaints received against Mr Luke Stubbs, the Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner (DPCC).

Copies of the PCC’s Code of Conduct and a copy of the public apology made by the DPCC on 22 December were tabled at the meeting.

The Chairman explained consideration of the complaints would be taken together as they related to the same matter, comments made by the DPCC at a meeting of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority on 14 December 2021.

The Chairman further explained the Sub-Committee would consider whether the complaints being reviewed demonstrated a failure to meet the Code of Conduct, as published on the Police and Crime Commissioner’s (PCC) website, and that the Sub-Committee’s finding will be made on fact. 

The Chairman noted that both complainants and the DPCC had been invited to attend the meeting but had declined, and therefore the Sub-Committee would rely upon their written representation. It was confirmed that outcomes of the meeting would be confirmed to all parties in writing.

The legal adviser was invited to raise any comments to the meeting, for which he confirmed he had none.

The Chairman observed from the evidence presented that:

·         The DPCC attended a meeting of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority on 14 December.

·         The minutes of that meeting noted that the DPCC had attended the meeting on behalf of the PCC, who had given her apologies. In this capacity he was invited to address the meeting.

·         During item 9 of that meeting the DPCC, by his own admission, had made a number of comments related to equality and diversity which were of his own personal view.

·         On 22 December 2021 the DPCC made a public apology for any harm or offence caused by the comments made.

·         The complainants alleged that in making these comments the DPCC had breached the code of conduct and caused reputational damage to the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC).

Members commented that it was appropriate that the DPCC had made a public apology, although one of the complainants considered the apology to be forced and therefore not entirely meaningful.

Members felt that the PCC had made her policy on matters of equality and diversity very clear since taking office and whilst acting as a representative of the PCC, any comment by the DPCC should have been reflective of the PCCs policy, not personal views which may not have been aligned with those of the PCC.

The meeting was adjourned in order for the Sub-Committee to consider the evidence that had been presented and to deliberate on their findings. When the meeting resumed, the Chairman announced the Panel’s determination that:

The Sub-Committee consider that, in speaking at the meeting of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Fire and Rescue Authority on 14 December 2021, as a representative of the Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC), the Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner (DPCC) brought the Office of the Police and Commissioner (OPCC) into disrepute and compromised the position of the PCC by expressing personal views and opinions which appeared to be contrary to the policy of the PCC.

Therefore, the Sub-Committee  determined that Mr Stubbs, in his role as the Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner, breached section 2.1.4 of the Code of Conduct.

Further, the Sub-Committee consider that the DPCC failed to abide by the Nolan Principles by not promoting and supporting the principles by leadership and example (section 1.1 of the code of conduct).

The Sub-Committee acknowledges that Mr Stubbs issued a public apology for any harm or offence caused by the comments made. Whilst being minded that the complainants asked to retain their anonymity, the Sub-Committee had no evidence that the DPCC requested to share his apology with the complainants through the Sub-Committee.

The Sub-Committee agreed the following recommendations to the PCC, following the review of these complaints, which would be shared with the PCC in writing:

·         That the PCC ensures any individual from the OPCC who is appointed to represent them on any occasion is fully briefed in advance to ensure that any views represented are aligned to the policy of the PCC.

·         Being minded of the PCC’s expressed intention to be open in communication, the Sub-Committee would recommend that the PCC undertake an internal review of the OPCC policies associated with the promotion of Public Sector Equality duty and equality of opportunity.

·         That the PCC ensures all members of staff at the OPCC, including those in senior roles, undertake appropriate training in Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion with regular refresh. The Sub-Committee would ask that an update on this recommendation be reported to the next meeting of the Panel’s Equality and Diversity Working Group.